6 years 5 months ago
We are sticking with Build.r and thanks for the earlier advice. We are well on our way with a minimum of problems. You might note that we licensed JoomlArt and Minitek. JoomlArt Builder came close but Build.r really got our attention.
We noticed that JoomlaBamboo has not supported K2 in a number of years. We assume this is because of the added features the Joomla! core team added to the content management system.
We tend to believe K2 is no longer necessary, but our customer does not. There was much talk earlier of a new grander version of K2 on the horizon, but it's still not here yet.
From a designer standpoint what do you think. An email response is fine with us.
Lastly, our customer decided to use LV-LinkDirectory as a directory for the site.
We are interested in knowing if Joomla Bamboo might be interested in some custom work to adapt the css and html for Build.r. We don't have a problem with licensing a second copy for JoomlaBamboo to make this possible.
We may need some more custom work further down the line. We started off with a strict budget, then the customer discovered JED. He sort of went bezerk on us.